Monday, May 4, 2009
Settlements Fight for Survival
A first hand description of bypass roads and the important role they play in maintaing settlements.
More Poetry from the Settlements
From Poem of the Mountain Village
a.
my life is here
in my house which I dug
in the mountain
b.
I would walk
my face against the wind
one of the hallowed winds
of Gush Etzion
all the stone houses are like
boulders growing out of the earth
raising rock fetuses
children of stone.
I am not of stone, in me
all is recorded
c.
when the column of smoke becomes too black
I escape to
the study hall
rub my eyes
with two thin webs of silver
d.
I came to the study hall
there
two flames
webs of thin silver are billowing
everyone is bound on the altar here, on the mountain
the flames of silver whisper
Shalom Karneil enters
approaches, sits next to me
wants us to write a poem jointly
and his hand hovers over min
almost coercing it to write
optimistic things
it's impossible to write poems jointly
I tell him
and he dissipates
e.
in the dining room
at evening
I see a smiling mustache
say the blessing over the warm bread
"Blessed art Thou, O Lord,
who brings forth bread from the rock"
and the again winds whistle after him:
amen selah, amen rock
-Eliaz Cohen
Settlement Types
The settlement character is typically divided into three subsets. The urban type of settlement has more of a cosmopolitan character to its makeup with large commercial and residential areas in a densely populated fashion. There are privately owned businesses as well and a vibrant service sector. Another type of settlement is the agricultural type in which farming and a pastoral existence was the norm. Both of these types of settlements had a large labor force consisting of Palestinians. The last type had no real definite infrastructural components unlike the other settlement types. These were the classic example of the "frontier" settlements that were instrumental in the push of such radical settlement organizations as Gush Eminum for expansion into the territories. One could say they are offshoots of nearby urban areas for they are entirely dependent on them.
Israeli Security Fence: Pros and Cons
A concept for Israeli security that has had some controversy surrounding it has been the security fence being constructed in the West-Bank; consisting of a network of fences with vehicle-barrier trenches surrounded by an on average 60 meters wide exclusion area and up to 8 meters high concrete walls. It is located mainly within the West Bank, partly along the 1949 Armistice line, or what is commonly considered the "Green Line." However, often times the security fence has succeeded past the “green line” under the pretense of including large settlements, this allows the Israeli government to thus annex land. The idea of creating a physical barrier between the Israeli and Palestinian populations was first proposed by Yitzhak Rabin in 1992, following the murder of an Israeli teenage girl in Jerusalem. Rabin said that Israel must “take Gaza out of Tel Aviv,” in order to minimize friction between the peoples; and supported a separation priniciple between Israel and the Palestinian territories
The barrier is a highly controversial project. Supporters argue that the barrier is a necessary tool protecting Israeli civilians from Palestinian terrorism. Opponents argue that the barrier is an illegal attempt to annex Palestinian land under the guise of security, violates international law, has the intent or effect to pre-empt final status negotiations, and severely restricts Palestinians who live nearby, particularly their ability to travel freely within the West Bank and to access work in Israel. Settler opponents, by contrast, condemn the wall for appearing to renounce the Jewish claim to the whole of Eretz Israel.
Overall, I can understand the stances of both sides of the argument. At first, I felt that the wall was a complete violation of Palestinian rights because it limits their movements, and illegally annexes their land. However, I can understand that perhaps a physical separation of the two, can lead to the creation of a two state solution if the Palestinians government can learn to work together and become self-sufficient without Israel.
The barrier is a highly controversial project. Supporters argue that the barrier is a necessary tool protecting Israeli civilians from Palestinian terrorism. Opponents argue that the barrier is an illegal attempt to annex Palestinian land under the guise of security, violates international law, has the intent or effect to pre-empt final status negotiations, and severely restricts Palestinians who live nearby, particularly their ability to travel freely within the West Bank and to access work in Israel. Settler opponents, by contrast, condemn the wall for appearing to renounce the Jewish claim to the whole of Eretz Israel.
Overall, I can understand the stances of both sides of the argument. At first, I felt that the wall was a complete violation of Palestinian rights because it limits their movements, and illegally annexes their land. However, I can understand that perhaps a physical separation of the two, can lead to the creation of a two state solution if the Palestinians government can learn to work together and become self-sufficient without Israel.
History of Israeli Settlements in West Banks
Interesting news story about Isreali settlements in the West Bank and their history.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)